Cases 1 - 10 of 2,217
Miller v. Miller
as 4:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
Lynn A. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller v. Schelp
as 4:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
Matthew T. Schelp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitehurst et al v. BJJ Enterprises, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Lashonda Whitehurst, Marvie Whitehurst, S W and others
Defendant:
BJJ Enterprises, LLC, Xpress Line, Inc. and Azamov Jakhongir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Taylor v. Dunklin County et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
J. W. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Dunklin County, State of Missouri, Steven Geary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Saint Louis City P.D.
as 4:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Alexandra M. Dean
Defendant:
Saint Louis City P.D., Darnell M. Willis, Edward Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. Macke et al
as 4:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
Darnell Moon and Darnell W. Moon
Defendant:
Daniel Macke, Kim Bramlett, Charles Doerge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Moon v. Bramlett
as 4:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Darnell W. Moon
Defendant:
Kimberly Bramlett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Moon v. Sam Scism Motors et al
as 4:2023cv01487
Plaintiff:
Darnell W. Moon
Defendant:
Sam Scism Motors doing business as Sam Scism Ford and Unknown Traveling Black Salesman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. Universal Pictures
as 4:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
Barry W. Jackson
Defendant:
Universal Pictures
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
