Cases 101 - 110 of 885
Mahey et al v. Keaton
as 3:2022cv05089
Plaintiff:
Parvez Kumar Mahey and Goodwill Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
Alexander Jason Keaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Dyer v. Crowley Logistics, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv03246
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE R DYER and Michelle R. Dyer
Defendant:
CROWLEY LOGISTICS, INC., CROWLEY LINER SERVICES, INC., MAG TRANSPORTATION LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Thompson v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv04136
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Thompson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Tyler et al v. Gebregergis
as 5:2022cv06116
Plaintiff:
Zariah Tyler and K. H.
Defendant:
Freweyni Gebregergis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 5:2022cv06114
Plaintiff:
Ms. Tyler Zariah, Terrika Barnes, Tyler Zariah and others
Defendant:
Freweyni Gebregergis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 5:2022cv06115
Defendant:
Terrika Barnes and Freweyni Gebregergis
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zariah Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Haynes v. Neiger
as 2:2022cv04121
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Haynes
Defendant:
Cameron D. Neiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Cosper v. Tjelle
as 5:2022cv06090
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Cosper
Defendant:
Christian Tjelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Burrows v. USA, et al
as 4:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
Isabella Louise Burrows
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Adams v. Penmark Transportation, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Brad Adams
Defendant:
Penmark Transportation, Inc., Antonio Spasov and Antonio Evgeniev Spasov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
