Cases 1 - 10 of 23
McDannell v. City of Gladstone et al
as 4:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Christopher M McDannell
Defendant:
City of Gladstone, Jean Moore, Gladstone Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacobs, Jr. v. Schuster et al
as 2:2023cv04214
Plaintiff:
Alfred Eugene Jacobs, Jr.
Defendant:
Sergeant Turner Schuster, Officer Gardner Pottorff, City of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Turner v. Wal-Mart Stores East, I LP
as 5:2023cv06107
Plaintiff:
Jonas Turner
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, I LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv06111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Turner v. City of Lee's Summit, Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv00546
Plaintiff:
Cymone A Turner
Defendant:
City of Lee's Summit, Missouri, James M. Tobin, Travis Forbes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Milliman v. Howell County, MO et al
as 6:2021cv03119
Defendant:
Levi Stoops, Howell County, MO, Michael P. Hutchings and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Gerald Milliman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. Missouri State Highway Patrol et al
as 2:2020cv04220
Plaintiff:
Stephen Griffith
Defendant:
Michael Turner, Missouri State Highway Patrol, Sandra Karsten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 4:2020cv00618
Defendant:
Gerald Snyder, Terrance Dooley, Jr., Travis Hewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
