Cases 21 - 30 of 321
Plopper v. Martinez
as 3:2023cv05029
Plaintiff:
John Plopper
Defendant:
Deputy Kenen Martinez and Kenen Lee Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Woodrow v. Springfield Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv03066
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Woodrow
Defendant:
Springfield Police Department, Brad Nicholson and Jason Friend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drew v. USA
as 4:2023cv00009
Petitioner:
Christopher Lee Drew
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Kozinski
as 5:2022cv06135
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Mike Kozinsri and Mike Kozinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry Jr. v. Krueger
as 6:2022cv03310
Petitioner:
Jerry Lee Berry Jr.
Respondent:
J.E. Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rich v. Archibeque et al
as 4:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
William Lee Rich
Defendant:
Adam Bradley Archibeque and Marshall Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess v. St. Joseph Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv06113
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Burgess
Defendant:
St. Joseph Police Department, Harrison, Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potter v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jason M Potter
Defendant:
Andrew Jones, City of Lee's Summit, Lee's Summit Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huskey Jr. v. Corizon/Centurion et al
as 2:2022cv04122
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Huskey Jr.
Defendant:
Corizon/Centurion, Dr. Lovelace, Beth Clad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dr. Kozminski
as 5:2022cv06068
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Mike Kozminski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
