Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hart v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 2:2011cv04147
Plaintiff:
Frank Hart
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation and Parole and George Lombardi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lott v. Dormire et al
as 4:2011cv00230
Petitioner:
Marvin Liddell Lott
Respondent:
Dave Dormire , George Lombardi and Missouri Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barker v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 4:2010cv00881
Plaintiff:
Samuel Barker
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, Trevor Harrison, Karla Brune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tatum v. Denny et al
as 4:2009cv00487
Petitioner:
Vernon Tatum
Respondent:
Larry Denny, Missouri Board of Probation and Parole and Chris Koster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 4:2009cv00449
Petitioner:
Alfred J Simmons
Respondent:
Missouri Board of Probation and Parole and Ellis McSwain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 2:2009cv04079
Plaintiff:
Randall G Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation and Parole and Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv06041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tyler v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole
as 4:2008cv00596
Petitioner:
Melvin Leroy Tyler
Respondent:
Missouri Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Murphy v. Dormire et al
as 4:2008cv00192
Petitioner:
Michael D Murphy
Respondent:
Dave Dormire, Missouri Board of Probation and Parole and Jeremiah (Jay) W Nixon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
