Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Postawko v. Corizon Medical Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv04219
Plaintiff: Michael G Postawko
Defendant: Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 2:2016cv04190
Plaintiff: Diamond D Blair
Defendant: Corizon Medical Services, Stacey Walkes, Ronald J Proctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheat v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 2:2016cv04109
Plaintiff: Jason Wheat
Defendant: Corizon Medical Services and Glen Babich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kremin v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2016cv06031
Plaintiff: Brian Kremin
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections, Western Missouri Correctional Center, WMCC Case Workers Housing Units 10,9,8,7,4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2016cv06013
Plaintiff: Roland T. Tyler
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections, Corizon Medical Services, Western Missouri Correctional Center Medical Providers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sauerbry v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 2:2015cv04011
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Scott Sauerbry
Defendant: Corizon Medical Services, Kangar, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheat v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 2:2014cv04238
Plaintiff: Jason Wheat
Defendant: Corizon Medical Services, Babich, Wanda Laramore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schnelle v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 5:2014cv06046
Plaintiff: James R Schnelle
Defendant: Corizon Medical Services, Matthews, Debbie Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 5:2013cv06143
Plaintiff: Artis Paul
Defendant: Corizon Medical Services, Dave Dormire, Larry Denney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?