Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Zike v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv04233
Plaintiff:
William Zike
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Missouri Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 2:2015cv04211
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Nelson
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation and Parole and Unknown Parole Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ausler v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 6:2015cv03305
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ausler
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, John Brower and State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Unknown Named U.S. Probation Officers
as 6:2015cv03156
Petitioner:
Michael Hunter
Respondent:
Unknown Named U.S. Probation Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Esposito v. Nixon et al
as 2:2015cv04073
Plaintiff:
Vincent J Esposito
Defendant:
Jay Nixon, George Lombardi, Jason Kander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neill v. Beetem et al
as 2:2014cv04169
Plaintiff:
Krisda J. Neill
Defendant:
Jon E Beetem, Thomas Chapman, Jeremiah Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
as 4:2014cv00443
Petitioner:
Steven Lydell Williams
Respondent:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nails v. State of Alabama et al
as 4:2014cv00234
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Mike West, James M Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2014cv04031
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
