Cases 71 - 80 of 124
United States of America v. Murphy
as 6:2012cv03354
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Timothy M. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Capone-Murphy et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00814
Plaintiff:
Desiree M. Capone-Murphy and Daniel Murphy
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50 (fictitious)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy-Hoffman Company v. Gunn
as 4:2012cv00678
Plaintiff:
Murphy-Hoffman Company
Defendant:
Tamara Gunn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv01292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guinn v. Matthew et al
as 5:2011cv06119
Plaintiff:
Tremayne L Guinn
Defendant:
John Matthew, John E Murphy, Janice Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wulf, et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as 4:2011mc09028
Plaintiff:
David R. Wulf and Wulf, Bates & Murphy, Inc.
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Murphy v. Southern Missouri Bank of Marshfield
as 6:2011cv03330
Plaintiff:
Peter Murphy
Defendant:
Southern Missouri Bank of Marshfield
Counter_claimant:
Southern Missouri Bank of Marshfield
Counter_defendant:
Peter Murphy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Murphy v. West Plains Savings & Loan
as 6:2011cv03331
Plaintiff:
Peter Murphy
Defendant:
West Plains Savings & Loan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Murphy v. Security Bank of Pulaski County
as 6:2011cv03329
Plaintiff:
Peter Murphy
Defendant:
Security Bank of Pulaski County
Counter_claimant:
Security Bank of Pulaski County
Counter_defendant:
Peter Murphy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
