Cases 1 - 10 of 903
Fortune v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Willie C Fortune
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Prime, Inc. v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv03155
Plaintiff:
New Prime, Inc. a Nebraska corporation doing business as Prime Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas D Johnson, Jr. and Frank E Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Petition for Indemnity
Johnson v. Dr. Moose et al
as 6:2024cv03140
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Moose and Nurse Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Jackson County et al
as 4:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
TeLissah R Johnson
Defendant:
MO Jackson County, Eric Lyles and Joseph Turley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Doe I et al
as 6:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Branca v. Lottinger et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
James Branca
Defendant:
Robert Lottinger, Steve Powell, Robert Taylor and others
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04042
Plaintiff:
Donald B. Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson-Byrd et al v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Arlene Johnson-Byrd and Louis Byrd
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
