Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Havens v. Morriss et al
as 5:2024cv06143
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Wendell Dean Havens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Yrigollen et al
as 4:2024cv00487
Defendant:
Kyle Yrigollen, Warden (2010-2012), Warden (2010) and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Goodwin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Goodwin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Havens v. Falkenrath
as 2:2024cv04009
Petitioner:
Wendell Dean Havens
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Speakes v. Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2023cv03112
Petitioner:
Joshua S Speakes
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Urbina v. Bureau of Prisons Physician
as 6:2022cv03238
Plaintiff:
Ramiro R Urbina
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons Physician
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ray v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2020cv00667
Petitioner:
Steven C. Ray, Jr.
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Melvin v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2020cv03077
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Bureau of Prisons Unknown Staff Members
Plaintiff:
Malcolm R L Melvin, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melvin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2020cv03013
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Malcolm R L Melvin, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradford v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2020cv03006
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Springfield Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
Plaintiff:
Kennon Bradford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
