Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Edmondson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Rachael J Edmondson
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Faruq v. Cooper County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2023cv04041
Defendant:
Brad Simmons, Rachael Atherton, Hannah Huntsperger and others
Plaintiff:
Khalifah A M Faruq
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CBD American Shaman, LLC et al v. Boyd et al
as 4:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Matthew Boyd and Rachael Boyd
Plaintiff:
CBD American Shaman, LLC and Stephen Vincent Sanders, II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1501 Unfair Competition claims for false advertising and trademark infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00526
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Summers et al v. Second Chance Homes, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04044
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Summers and Carol Samson
Defendant:
Second Chance Homes, LLC , Rachael Rowden , Sherry Paulo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Guess v. Colvin
as 6:2015cv03228
Plaintiff:
Rachael Guess
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hight v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv03083
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Rachael Hight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Seymore v. High-Tech Institute
as 4:2011cv00717
Plaintiff:
Rachael Seymore
Defendant:
High-Tech Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv00504
Plaintiff:
Rachael Z. James
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Morrison et al v. C.R. England, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00873
Plaintiff:
Mark Morrison, Kim Morrison, Rachael Morrison and others
Defendant:
C.R. England, Inc., C.R. England, Inc., Vincent P. Vulpi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
