Cases 1 - 10 of 722
Raybourn v. Centurion Medical Services, et al
as 5:2024cv06072
Plaintiff:
Connie Ann Raybourn
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Chris McBee, Todd Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
New Prime, Inc. v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv03155
Plaintiff:
New Prime, Inc. a Nebraska corporation doing business as Prime Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas D Johnson, Jr. and Frank E Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Petition for Indemnity
Johnson v. Dr. Moose et al
as 6:2024cv03140
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Moose and Nurse Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Humphrey v. Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
as 6:2024cv03135
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 2:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Angela Carson
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Lucas Anderson, Joshua Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stein v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Stein
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Humphrey v. Missouri State Highway Patrol
as 2:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
Missouri State Highway Patrol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
