Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Grisham v. Banks et al
as 4:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Bobby Glen Grisham, III
Defendant:
Rob Banks , Brad Carver , Jerry Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Kellum et al
as 1:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
Malinda Todd
Defendant:
Brad Kellum , The Home Gallery, LLC , Wheel Estate Mobile Homes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Whitefoot et al v. Sheriff of Clay County et al
as 1:2014cv00113
Defendant:
Sheriff of Clay County, Eddie Scott, Brad Pettit and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Whitefoot and Elena R. Whitefoot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitefoot et al v. Two (2) Sheriffs of Clay County, et al
as 1:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
David J. Whitefoot and Elena R. Whitefoot
Defendant:
Two (2) Sheriffs of Clay County, Eddie Scott, Brad Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Rasco, et al.
as 2:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Jairie T. Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Bill Rasco, Keith Kite, Billy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Pontotoc County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Karon S. Bradley
Defendant:
Pontotoc County Sheriff's Department , Pontotoc County, Mississippi and Brad Owen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nabors et al v. Safeco Insurance
as 1:2012cv00194
Plaintiff:
Billie Nabors and Brad Nabors
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00076
Plaintiff:
Brad Oneal Davis
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pierce v. Lance et al
as 2:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jairie T. Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Brad Lance, Joe Gallop, Steve Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nobles v. Leflore County, et al
as 4:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Justin Nobles
Defendant:
Leflore County, , Richard Chip Roberts , Brad Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
