Cases 11 - 20 of 39
White v. Tunica County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2016cv00182
Plaintiff:
Angela White
Defendant:
Tunica County, Mississippi, Tunica County, Mississippi Sheriff's Department, K. C. Hamp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barnes et al v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC et al
as 4:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Bobby Barnes , Charles E. Blanks , Vernell Burks and others
Defendant:
John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC , John M. O'Quinn & Associates L.L.P. , John M. O'Quinn, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Burnett et al
as 3:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Eugene Burnett and The Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenneth v. Morris et al
as 4:2015cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eugene Fox, Sr.
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Patricia Powell, Delois Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd et al v. Pamplin et al
as 3:2015cv00106
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Boyd , Edna Hudson and Eugene Houston
Defendant:
James Pamplin and Stanley Bros Farms, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Turner et al
as 1:2015cv00057
Petitioner:
Eugene Davis
Respondent:
Marshal Turner and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Long v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
Rick Eugene Long
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Hathcock v. Godwin
as 4:2014cv00130
Plaintiff:
Harry Eugene Hathcock
Defendant:
Robbie B. Godwin, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fox v. Smith
as 3:2014cv00053
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Fox, Sr.
Respondent:
Arthur L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. King et al
as 3:2013cv00253
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Davis
Respondent:
Ronald King and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
