Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Duff v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Virginia Duff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Mincy v. Delta Dental Plans Association et al
as 1:2019cv00227
Defendant:
Delta Dental of Wisconsin, Delta Dental Plans Association, Delta Dental Plan of West Virginia, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Catherine J. Mincy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
L.L.D., LLC et al v. Enpro Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00046
Plaintiff:
Jennie M. Clement, Robert O. Walker, 2 Hill LLC and others
Defendant:
Enpro Industries, Inc., Samuel G. Williamson, Goodrich Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKinney v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00164
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Virginia McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan v. Guy
as 1:2018cv00163
Defendant:
Virginia F. Guy
Plaintiff:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wiggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
Virginia Wiggs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Brown v. Warren et al
as 3:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
Virginia S. Brown
Defendant:
Adam W. Warren , Comcast Corporation , John Doe Person(s) 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thorpe et al v. WMS Gaming, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00147
Plaintiff:
Rande Thorpe and Virginia Thorpe
Defendant:
WMS Gaming, Inc., Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Harrah's Tunica Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watt v. City of Columbus, Mississippi
as 1:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Virginia Watt
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv00133
Plaintiff:
Virginia Victoria Rose
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
