Cases 61 - 70 of 109
Kelley v. Yalobosha County MS Sherriff's Dept et al
as 3:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kelley
Defendant:
Yalobosha County MS Sherriff's Dept, Lloyd Defer, Steve Story and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 3:2014cv00047
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smith
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel v. Brady et al
as 4:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
Edward Daniel
Defendant:
Vanita Brady, Kins, E. Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bell et al v. Bolivar County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2013cv00141
Plaintiff:
Aretha Bell , Lisa M. Daniels , Me'Unca Dukes and others
Defendant:
Bolivar County, Mississippi, H.M. Mack Grimmett, Unknown Sheriff's Deputies of Bolivar County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dotson v. Homesite Insurance Company et al
as 3:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dotson
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Teague v. SMM South Corporation
as 4:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teague
Defendant:
SMM South Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Langston v. Rasco et al
as 3:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Lee Langston
Defendant:
Bill Rasco, Chad Wicker, Louis Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
