Cases 61 - 70 of 103
Evans v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2007cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Evans
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2007cv00182
Plaintiff:
Donald Craig
Defendant:
E. L. Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly and Ricky Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker et al v. Epps
as 4:2007cv00176
Plaintiff:
Alan Dale Walker, Alan Dale Walker, Earl Wesley Berry and others
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tommy Jackson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmit Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peacock v. Kelly et al
as 3:2007cv00109
Petitioner:
James Peacock
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shorty v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2007cv00150
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Shorty
Defendant:
E. L. Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly and John Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westbrook v. Kelly et al
as 1:2007cv00214
Petitioner:
Larry Westbrook
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrison v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00149
Plaintiff:
Roger Morrison
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Ann Armstrong, Rebecca Blount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. Kelly et al
as 1:2007cv00210
Petitioner:
Barry Stephan Townsend
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luckett v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00083
Plaintiff:
Alvin V. Luckett, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Epps, Lawrence Kelly, Charles Hand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
