Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Carrothers v. Disciplinary Hearing Office et al
as 4:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Antonio Carrothers
Defendant:
Disciplinary Hearing Office, Lt. Hampton and Warden McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Hampton
as 3:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Catrina Hampton
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Holder v. White et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Carl Holder
Defendant:
Dakota White and Major S. Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Amerson v. Dudley et al
as 4:2023cv00132
Petitioner:
Lee Tommie Amerson
Defendant:
Capt. Robert Dudley, Major Sharon Hampton, Inv. Martha Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Hampton
as 3:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angela Hampton
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Hoye v. McClure et al
as 4:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Hoye
Defendant:
Marcus McClure, Tracey McDonald, Lee Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick v. McClure et al
as 4:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Cadarrio Patrick
Defendant:
Marcus McClure, Timothy Morris, Tracy McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Shrena Hampton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Greyer et al v. City of Shelby et al
as 4:2021cv00112
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Greyer and Lakisha Mell
Defendant:
City of Shelby, Chief Kenneth Hampton and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
