Cases 41 - 50 of 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Bennett v. Young et al
as 3:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
Tim Bennett
Defendant:
Ken Young and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Baugh et al v. Austal USA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Paul David Baugh, Jr., David Dudley, Carl Skipper and others
Defendant:
Austal USA, LLC and John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thompson v. VCP Covington Park I, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Thompson
Defendant:
VCP Covington Park I, LLC, VCP Manager, LLC, Fortis Property Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Lofton v. Franklin County Mississippi et al
as 5:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Ethan Lofton
Defendant:
Franklin County Mississippi, Amite County Mississippi and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Hinds Community College et al
as 3:2022cv00374
Plaintiff:
Barbara Evans
Defendant:
Hinds Community College, Stephen Vacik, Andrea Janoush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bennett v. Young et al
as 3:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Tim Bennett
Defendant:
Ken Young and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Andrews v. 1788 Chicken, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Debra Elizabeth Andrews
Defendant:
1788 Chicken, LLC d/b/a Zaxbys and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
