Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Hubbard v. Vilsack
as 3:2021cv00340
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montag v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Carlos Solis, Scott Montag, Sara OConnor and others
Plaintiff:
Mathew Montag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gonzalez v. Wingate et al
as 5:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzalez and Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Defendant:
Louis Guirola, Jr., David Bramlette, Michael T. Parker and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Graham Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00240
Defendant:
Graham Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tom Lee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gandy v. Turner et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Gandy
Defendant:
Tom S. Lee, David Turner and Michael C. Moore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bay Point Properties, Inc. v. Mississippi Transportation Commission et al
as 1:2017cv00207
Plaintiff:
Bay Point Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Mississippi Transportation Commission, Mississippi Department of Transportation, Dick Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amica Mutual Insurance Company v. Ostenson et al
as 3:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tom L. Ostenson, Todd Jason Middleton and Courtenay Middleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cole et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00390
Plaintiff:
Tom Cole and Frances Cole
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. Sturdivant et al
as 3:2015cv00441
Plaintiff:
Sidney Chappel Nelson
Defendant:
Robert Sturdivant, Emmit L. Sparkman, Tom Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deering et al v. Vulsack
as 3:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
Willie Deering and Geneva Burks
Defendant:
Tom Vulsack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
