Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Steverson v. Forrest County Mississippi et al
as 2:2012cv00169
Plaintiff:
Derrick Steverson
Defendant:
Forrest County Mississippi , Forrest County Sheriff's Department , Billy McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Whitfield v. City of Ridgeland et al
as 3:2011cv00744
Plaintiff:
Charles Dwight Whitfield
Defendant:
City of Ridgeland, Ridgeland Police Department, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz-Then v. Laughlin
as 5:2011cv00167
Plaintiff:
Rafael De La Cruz-Then
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cruz-Alonzo v. USA
as 1:2011cv00438
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlos Cruz-Alonzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mejia-Cruz v. Beasley
as 5:2011cv00075
Plaintiff:
Horacio Mejia-Cruz
Defendant:
Unknown Beasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Mississippi Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2010cv00446
Plaintiff:
Cirila Baltazar Cruz
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Human Services, Singing River Health System, Vicki Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mejia et al v. Mason Pro, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
Honorato Mejia , Cruz Rangel and Adrian Garcia
Defendant:
Mason Pro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nunn v. Epps et al
as 2:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
Cruz Nunn
Defendant:
Christopher Epps , Ronald King, Connie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz-Cardenas v. USA
as 1:2009cv00356
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Pedro Cruz-Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Frias et al
as 1:2008cv00128
Plaintiff:
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Defendant:
Constancio Frias, Manuel Covarrubias, Goldie Ann Covarrubias and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
