Cases 31 - 40 of 393
United States of America v. Cain et al
as 1:2022cv00011
Defendant:
Harold T. Cain, Ted, Julie P. Cain and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Evans v. Pennington et al
as 5:2021cv00101
Plaintiff:
Curtis Evans
Defendant:
Robert Pennington and Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Evans et al
as 3:2021cv00729
Plaintiff:
Zitavion Daytrun Rush
Defendant:
Thelma Evans, Chris Hollingsworth, Alex Unknown and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Madison County Detention Center et al
as 3:2021cv00690
Plaintiff:
James Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Madison County Detention Center, Nurse Evan, Nurse Lori and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayeux v. Howard et al
as 1:2021cv00332
Plaintiff:
Connie Mayeux
Defendant:
Thomas Howard, Jr., Greatwide American Trans-Freight, LLC, Evans Delivery Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 2:2021cv00139
Plaintiff:
Robert Evans and R.D. Evans
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cotton v. Winfield et al
as 3:2021cv00577
Plaintiff:
Cameron Leigh Cotton
Defendant:
Paul Evans Winfield, Linda Evans Winfield, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. USA
as 1:2021cv00288
Petitioner:
Dandre Dshon Evans
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clark v. Hubbard
as 1:2021cv00228
Plaintiff:
Candra Beth Clark
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Even Hubbard and Evan Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
