Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Digital Licensing Inc. et al
as 3:2023mc02984
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Digital Licensing Inc. a Wyoming corporation doing business as DEBT Box, Jason R. Anderson, Jacob S. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00306
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Keys et al
as 3:2020cv00296
Defendant:
Simpson County CPS/DHS, Simpson County Chancery Court, Simpson County Youth Court and others
Plaintiff:
Latoya F. Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. BP America Production Company et al
as 1:2019cv00448
Plaintiff:
Tracy Mikeal Bowen
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Bowens v. Hall et al
as 1:2017cv00327
Plaintiff:
Deontra Bowens
Defendant:
Pelicia E. Hall, Unknown Brewer, Unknown Roger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. ANSH Properties, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00632
Plaintiff:
Monica Blackmon
Defendant:
ANSH Properties, LLC , Ranjana Singh , Daniel Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Creel v. Bowen et al
as 2:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Walter Creel
Defendant:
Eddie H. Bowen, Jim Hood, Danial C. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
