Cases 1 - 10 of 1,165
Jenkins v. Dykes et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jenkins
Defendant:
Christopher Dykes, George Rembert, Daphane Ellis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mack
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Ricky Davis, Brett McAlpin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dressner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Ronald Christopher Dressner
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hearin v. Lammico et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Defendant:
Lammico, Lammico Insurance Agency, Inc., Joseph Larriviere and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Peno Hearin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cage v. Ballard et al
as 5:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cage
Defendant:
Christopher Ballard and The United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Sternell Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Willis et al v. Walter P. Rawl & Sons, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christopher Willis and Tonya Willis
Defendant:
Walter P. Rawl & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hanberry v. Buford Plumbing Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Christopher Payne Hanberry
Defendant:
Buford Plumbing Company, Inc., Thomas Anthony Shows, Vencen Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
