Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 14,484
Wellman v. USA
as 7:2024cv00541
Petitioner: Corey Wellman
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hunt v. Global Tel Link Corporation et al
as 5:2024hc02124
Petitioner: Michael Eugene Hunt
Respondent: Global Tellink Corporation, ViaPath Technologies and Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bohlman v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2024hc02125
Petitioner: Jeremy Bohlman
Respondent: Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02123
Petitioner: Jamal Lewis
Respondent: Tom Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 5:2024ct03159
Plaintiff: Anthony D. Williams and Anthony Davis Williams
Defendant: L.B. Kelly, Ms. Long, John Doe Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stone v. Director of BOP et al
as 5:2024ct03158
Plaintiff: Samuel Stone
Defendant: Director of BOP and NC DAC Prison Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02121
Petitioner: Richard Tolbert
Respondent: Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Langley v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02122
Petitioner: Darnell Langley
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mabry v. USA
as 5:2024cv00348
Petitioner: "TJ"
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Moran v. USA
as 5:2024cv00343
Petitioner: Emilio R. Moran
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?