Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clark v. City of Greenville, North Carolina et al
as 4:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Clark
Defendant:
City of Greenville, North Carolina, Nicholas Carnevale, Fred Gorham, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Reynolds et al v. United States Government et al
as 7:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Save Our Children Truth Commission, Melody Rodgers, Malachi Chapman and others
Defendant:
United States Government, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Dana Davis, Lora Byers, Kimberly Vifinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Brown Clark v. Meads et al
as 4:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
Lillie Brown Clark
Defendant:
Daniel Meads, Robert Morgan, Aaron Lewellyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kebort et al v. Stiehl et al
as 5:2017cv00418
Plaintiff:
Nancy H. Kebort and B.H.K.
Defendant:
Robert Stiehl, James Cooke, Margit Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
