Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Clark v. City of Greenville, North Carolina et al
as 4:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Clark
Defendant:
City of Greenville, North Carolina, Nicholas Carnevale, Fred Gorham, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nicholas v. ILA Local 1426 et al
as 7:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Reita L. Nicholas
Defendant:
ILA Local 1426, Greg Washington, Fred Spain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
The Estate of Travis Terrell Morris v. Hughes et al
as 4:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Travis Terrell Morris
Defendant:
Sheriff Fred Hughes, III, Sergeant Terrence Damon Harkley, Corporal Thomas Michael Bersch, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Davis v. Fred's, et al
as 5:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
Andrew C. Davis
Defendant:
Fred's, Axcess Staffing, Donald J. Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ipock v. Hughes et al
as 4:2021cv00099
Plaintiff:
Chad Ipock
Defendant:
Fred Hughes, III, Jerry Monette, Lee Roy Thomas, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00084
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jackson v. Harlow et al
as 5:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Keith Jackson
Defendant:
David L. Harlow, Scott Parker, Rob Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Harlow et al
as 5:2018ct03029
Plaintiff:
Keith Jackson
Defendant:
David L. Harlow, Scott Parker, Rob Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. North Carolina State Bar
as 5:2014cv00243
Plaintiff:
David Campbell Sutton
Defendant:
The North Carolina State Bar , Mary Winstead , Carmen Bannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
