Cases 11 - 20 of 105
Clark v. Nash Correctional Institution
as 5:2023ct03091
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Clark
Defendant:
Nash Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02018
Petitioner:
Jodie A. Clark
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Letterlough v. Clark et al
as 5:2023ct03042
Plaintiff:
Derrick Derrail Letterlough
Defendant:
Demetrius A. Clark, Ja'Maar Watson and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Clark et al
as 5:2022ct03428
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. Harris
Defendant:
Betty H. Clark, Carmen Hendricks and Ronald Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Grande et al
as 5:2022ct03405
Plaintiff:
Lamate Sherron Anderson and Every Inmate of State of North Carolina
Defendant:
Kimberly D. Grande, D. Clark, Officer Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Simpson et al
as 5:2022ct03252
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Simpson, Dr. Straiger, Dr. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022ct03110
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Roy Cooper, Todd Pomeroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehurst v. Clark et al
as 5:2022ct03047
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ronnell Whitehurst
Defendant:
Demetrius A. Clark, Anthony A. Adams, Timothy Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark
as 5:2022hc02023
Petitioner:
Jonathan Wayne Clark
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clark v. Smith et al
as 5:2021ct03323
Plaintiff:
Reginald Clark
Defendant:
Jacqueline Smith, Anna Demeka Bell, Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
