Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Lilly v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 5:2023ct03273
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Lilly
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Katherine Jackson, Suzan Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Politi et al
as 5:2023ct03206
Plaintiff:
Randall Chandler
Defendant:
Dr. Politi, Wellpath, LLC, Captain M. Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Anderson et al
as 5:2023ct03125
Plaintiff:
Robert Jeremy Haynes
Defendant:
Officer M. Anderson and Officer Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2023ct03120
Plaintiff:
James E. Anderson
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00007
Petitioner:
Sadequin Anderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Anderson et al v. Grande et al
as 5:2022ct03405
Plaintiff:
Lamate Sherron Anderson and Every Inmate of State of North Carolina
Defendant:
Kimberly D. Grande, D. Clark, Officer Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Butner F.M.C. et al
as 5:2022ct03371
Plaintiff:
Michael Battle
Defendant:
Butner F.M.C., Warden T. Scarantino, D. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Galbreath et al
as 5:2022ct03319
Plaintiff:
Pierre Jamar Walker
Defendant:
Pamela F. Galbreath, Bianca D. Lawrence, Mark Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayat v. Justice et al
as 5:2022ct03185
Plaintiff:
Adam Hayat
Defendant:
Counselor Justice and Counselor Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DeCory v. Anderson et al
as 5:2022ct03152
Plaintiff:
William M.A. DeCory and William Martin Ardene DeCory
Defendant:
D. Anderson, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
