Cases 1 - 10 of 215
Avent v. Wind et al
as 5:2024ct03037
Plaintiff:
Antonio Santwan Avent
Defendant:
John E. Wind, David Bradley, Samuel D. Langley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilder v. New Hanover County North Carolina et al
as 5:2023hc02268
Petitioner:
Lawrence Verline Wilder
Respondent:
New Hanover County North Carolina, Jail Administrator Evers, New Hanover County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Spence et al
as 5:2023ct03250
Plaintiff:
David A. Patterson
Defendant:
David Spence, Judge Harrell, Dallas Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reich v. Stanley et al
as 5:2023ct03241
Plaintiff:
Scott Randall Reich
Defendant:
Superintendent Stanley, Talena H. Lee, Mr. Vorhees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealey v. White et al
as 5:2023ct03215
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Nealey
Defendant:
Dr. David E. White, RN Scott, RN Storm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waters v. Coleman et al
as 5:2023ct03205
Plaintiff:
William Charles Waters
Defendant:
Ernie Coleman, Scott Hammonds, Lt. M. Ormond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02129
Petitioner:
Scott Brooks
Respondent:
L. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hemphill v. Huntley et al
as 5:2023ct03160
Plaintiff:
Scott Devon Hemphill
Defendant:
Greg Huntley, Steve Whisenant, Mr. Viggers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 5:2023hc02060
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 5:2023ct03068
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
