Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Sterling v. Andrews
as 5:2016hc02287
Petitioner:
David J. Sterling
Respondent:
Justin Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boone v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2016mc00037
Plaintiff:
Sterling Boone
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Fowler v. The City of Wilmington, et al.
as 7:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
Denise Fowler
Defendant:
The City of Wilmington , The City of Wilmington Collections Department , Bill Saffo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arce et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 7:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Matthew Arce , Devyn Born , Edward Burchette and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Arce et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. -
as 4:2016cv00047
Plaintiff:
Matthew Arce , Devyn Born , Edward Burchette and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Ricks, Jr. et al v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00037
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Coen Company, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Sam Ricks, Jr. and Brenda Ricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Peacock v. USA
as 5:2013cv00006
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sterling Junior Peacock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00639
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Goldman v. Webster et al
as 5:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
Lance Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Sterling Webster, Brian Strickland, Jeremy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGE et al v. ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 5:2010cv00158
Plaintiff:
ROGER S. PAGE and PAULA PAGE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
