Cases 191 - 200 of 37,938
Frannicola et al v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Arthur J Frannicola and Joy A Frannicola
Defendant:
Real Time Resolutions, Inc. and RRA 2 CP, LLC, Real Time Resolutions, Inc. and RRA 2 CP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Jones County Board of Education v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jones County Board of Education
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook Payments, Inc., Siculus, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bobbitt v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02103
Petitioner:
Deon Patrick Bobbitt
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Ernest Evans
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Williams v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
McArthur v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Tonya McArthur
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
