Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Day v. USA
as 4:2013cv00239
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Wesley Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sherlock v. Extended Reach Day Treatment, LLC, et al
as 5:2013cv00651
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. Lisa Sherlock and State of North Carolina ex rel. Lisa Sherlock
Defendant:
Extended Reach Day Treatment for Children and Adolescents, LLC and Andrea Boatman-Hall
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00140
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Noelle Enterprises, Inc. v. The Gerson Company et al
as 7:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Noelle Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
The Gerson Company and Kevin Day
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Day v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kristin D. Day
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Masterfile Corporation v. Nirvelli Day Spa Corporation et al
as 5:2011cv00132
Plaintiff:
Masterfile Corporation
Defendant:
Nirvelli Day Spa Corporation, David Sefried and Heather Sefried
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rios v. Day et al
as 7:2009cv00193
Plaintiff:
Frank A. Rios
Defendant:
Timothy G. Day, Robert G. Lucas, Karen S. Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Day et al
as 7:2009cv00004
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Phil Day, Sharon Day, Gavin Day and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Swope Personal Property
as 7:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Seventy-Six (76) Floppy Disks, Three (3) Compact Disks, Fourteen CD Roms and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
