Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Atad et al v. Atad
as 5:2013cv00416
Plaintiff:
Rosanna Dee Atad and IA
Defendant:
Jeffrey Basil Atad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Dorsey v. Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00313
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dorsey
Defendant:
Dee Johnson and Gonzalo Cabral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. USA
as 5:2012cv00278
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darick Dee Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sears v. Price et al
as 5:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Keith James Sears
Defendant:
Debra Price, Bernard P. Condlin, Sue Genrich Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009hc02100
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Compentency/Other Dist.
Dees v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2009ct03040
Plaintiff:
Shannon Dees
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Donald A Gardner Architects, Inc. et al v. Vanderpool et al
as 5:2008cv00590
Plaintiff:
Donald A Gardner Architects, Inc. and Allora, LLC
Defendant:
Bryan Vanderpool, Tommy Dees and Cambridge Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2008ct03130
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Davis
Defendant:
United States Of America, Chatman, Dee and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. Albemarle Electric Membership Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv00261
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel., WILLIAM G. ROSS, JR., SECRETARY, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES
Defendant:
Albermarle Electric Membership Corporation, Berkeley Electric Cooperative, Inc., Black River Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
