Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 154
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00290
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Huff v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023ct03163
Plaintiff: Peter D. Huff
Defendant: Nurse Thomas, Nurse Griffith, Sgt. Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Harris et al
as 5:2023ct03159
Plaintiff: Joseph Stewart
Defendant: Brandeshawn Harris, Peter Buchholtz, Daryll Vann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huff v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023ct03139
Plaintiff: Peter D. Huff
Defendant: Nurse Thomas, Nurse Griffith, Sgt. Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Buchholtz et al
as 5:2023hc02082
Petitioner: Michael Eugene Hunt
Respondent: Peter Buchholtz, Morris Reid and Josh Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Northrop v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00834
Plaintiff: Peter Northrop
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Joiner v. Buchholtz et al
as 5:2023ct03086
Plaintiff: Raymond Joiner
Defendant: Peter Buchholtz, Todd E. Ishee and Jamal James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00233
Plaintiff: Cortina Peters
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Ehlenberger v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00195
Plaintiff: Peter Lee Ehlenberger
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Optekar v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00134
Plaintiff: Peter Stuart Optekar
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?