Cases 21 - 30 of 132
Park et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Robert Russell Park, Jennifer Rose Park and Jennifer Park
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Drayton v. United States of America DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 7:23-CV-109-D-RJ.
as 4:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Russell Drayton
Defendant:
United States of America
Drayton v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Russell Drayton
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Wilson v. FCC Butner et al
as 5:2022ct03457
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant:
FCC Butner, Lynn B. Kelly, Officer Sosa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Butler v. Davenport et al
as 5:2022ct03447
Plaintiff:
Jasheem Shamar Butler
Defendant:
Russell Davenport, Sergeant Shiflett, Jason Cleary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Inscoe v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022ct03412
Plaintiff:
William Inscoe and Ashlee Inscoe
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Eddie Buffaloe, Charlotte Jordan-Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Nivo Corporation
as 5:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
William R. Russell
Defendant:
Nivo Corporation doing business as Mekkelek Custom Woodwork & Cabinetry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Ray v. Russell et al
as 5:2022ct03362
Plaintiff:
Darin Anthony Ray
Defendant:
Sgt. Russell and Asst. Unit Manager Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kee v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv00179
Plaintiff:
Russell Kee
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
