Cases 31 - 40 of 37,813
Rogers v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02106
Petitioner:
Antwarn Lee Rogers
Respondent:
Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 39,991.998502 USDT Virtual Currency
as 5:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
39,991.998502 USDT Virtual Currency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Dixon v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dixon
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Bastas v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02105
Petitioner:
Andreas Peter Bastas
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024ct03141
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
Darren G. Jackson, Graham H. Atkinson, Gregory K. Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ainscough v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02104
Petitioner:
Jared Ainscough
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pacheco v. Markeke et al
as 5:2024ct03140
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Officer Markeke, Sergeant Hall, Lieutenant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
James Sterling Moore d/b/a Outer Banks Adventures;
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Wong v. Countyline Auto Center Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
Susanne Wong
Respondent:
Countyline Auto Center Inc. d/b/a Lexus of Pembroke Pines, a Florida based automobile dealership, Toyota Financial Services Securities USA Corporation and TQI Exchange, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bobbitt v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02103
Petitioner:
Deon Patrick Bobbitt
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
