Cases 31 - 40 of 608
Gibson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
James Gibson, II and James Edward Gibson, II
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Chandler v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01614
Plaintiff:
Arthur Edward Chandler
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Aaron et al v. Corteva, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv01599
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS DOWDUPONT, INC., EIDP, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, CORTEVA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN AARON, JOHN ADAMSON, MARY AZAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Parr v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01381
Plaintiff:
Lance Edward Parr
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Moore et al v. Barnes et al
as 2:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Mary Moore and Gary Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Johnny Barnes, Jeffrey Aaron Edwards, Brian Aaron Mizelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Devone v. USA
as 5:2023cv00654
Petitioner:
Edward Dominique Devone
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Gary Edward Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
King v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01514
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward King
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Dugger v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02242
Petitioner:
Edward Roy Dugger
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dib v. F4L Sports, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Michael Dib
Defendant:
F4L Sports, Inc., Perk Fitness of Spring Lake, Inc., Fit4Life Franchising, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
