Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00877
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Case Opened in Error
as 5:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
Fred Woody, Jr.
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Davis et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00010
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Bank of New York Mellon, As Trustee for GSRPM Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2003-1
Plaintiff:
Fred A Davis and Delores G Davis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Caldwell v. Tucker et al
as 5:2015ct03080
Plaintiff:
Henry M. Caldwell
Defendant:
Fred Tucker and Clarence Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Fink et al
as 5:2015ct03061
Plaintiff:
Ellison Ray Holmes
Defendant:
Gary L. Fink, Amy M. Leeper, Richard Hadley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: NC Swine Farm Nuisance Litigation
as 5:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs , Betty Collier , Andrew High and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC , Joyce Ann Hardison and Daisy J. Fennell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams et al v. Solomon et al
as 5:2014ct03309
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Williams, Lorenzo Graham, Curtis Wise and others
Defendant:
George Solomon, John Carbone, Tricia Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKiver et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 4:2014cv00153
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Plaintiff:
Joyce McKiver , Delois Lewis , Dennis McKiver, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sutton v. North Carolina State Bar
as 5:2014cv00243
Plaintiff:
David Campbell Sutton
Defendant:
The North Carolina State Bar , Mary Winstead , Carmen Bannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Boston Specific Corporation
as 5:2013cv00737
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ann Miller and Fred M. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
