Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Thomas v. Chapman et al
as 5:2011cv00694
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Thomas
Defendant:
Ronald L. Chapman, Christy T. Mann, George E. Battle, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Glover v. Brock Payne & Meece PA Attorneys at Law
as 5:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Sharron Marie Glover
Defendant:
Brock Payne & Meece PA Attorneys at Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Myers et al v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2012cv00714
Plaintiff:
Loushonda Myers, C.M., A.M. and others
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Krista L. Bennet, Fern Gunn Simeon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hewett v. Sue et al
as 7:2012cv00325
Plaintiff:
Bernest Hewett
Defendant:
M. William Sue, Phil Norris, John Martin Cooke, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Barnes v. Astrue et al
as 5:2012cv00696
Plaintiff:
Hilda Rose Barnes
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue , Eric Holder, Jr., Office of Program Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Clark v. The Ballato Law Firm, P.C., et al
as 5:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
Dana Clark
Defendant:
The Ballato Law Firm, P.C and Michael B. Ballato
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
