Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Rankin v. Norwood et al
as 5:2024ct03089
Plaintiff:
Shurod Rankin
Defendant:
Lieutenant Norwood, Sergeant P. Fobbs and Major Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Windsor Police Department et al
as 5:2024ct03068
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Windsor Police Department, City of Windsor, Bertie County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. McManus
as 5:2024hc02051
Petitioner:
Shurod Rankin
Respondent:
Shawn McManus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rankins v. Windsor Police Department
as 5:2024ct03029
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Windsor Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin Bey v. Parks et al
as 5:2023ct03034
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Lt. Parks, Sgt. Smith, Sgt. Yearger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03259
Plaintiff:
Johnte Rankins
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03237
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James, Larry Robinson, Anthony Michael Finney and others
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin Bey v. Ball et al
as 5:2021ct03153
Defendant:
Warden Mike Slayer, Ms. Georgi, P.A. Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Medical Private Contractor
as 5:2021ct03095
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Medical Private Contractor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Singleton et al
as 5:2021ct03059
Defendant:
Warden Hankins, Capt. Pittman, Warden Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
