Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
D. M. Conlon, Inc. v. Cherry Creek Recycling LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
D. M. Conlon, Inc.
Defendant:
Cherry Creek Recycling LLC and The Guarantee Company of North America USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D. M. Conlon, Inc. v. Cherry Creek Recycling LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00003
Plaintiff:
D. M. Conlon, Inc.
Defendant:
Cherry Creek Recycling LLC and The Guarantee Company of North America USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Liverman Metal Recycling, Inc. et al v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
as 4:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Liverman Metal Recycling, Inc. and Empire Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Glenn v. Metech Recycling, Inc., et al
as 5:2016cv00697
Plaintiff:
Gurley E. Glenn
Defendant:
Metech Recycling, Inc., Mike McMorrow and Andrew McManus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00541
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Shotwell Landfill, Inc. et al v. LSCG Fund 18, LLC
as 5:2014cv00427
Movant:
Shotwell Landfill, Inc. , Capitol Waste Transfer, LLC , Capitol Recycling, LLC and others
Respondent:
LSCG Fund 18, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The ERAS Group, Inc. v. Free Flo Water Recycling Systems, LLC et al
as 5:2008cv00524
Plaintiff:
The ERAS Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Free Flo Water Recycling Systems, LLC and Mark C. Urban
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barber v. Pioneer Machinery, LLC, et al
as 4:2008cv00124
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc. and Pioneer Machinery, LLC
Plaintiff:
Leland M. Barber, Jr. doing business as B.M.E. Recycling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
