Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Polk et al v. Kampgrounds of America, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Polk and RV Savvy Productions, Inc. d/b/a RV Education 101
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-100 and Kampgrounds of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
United States of America v. Smithfield Foods, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Andre Polk
Garnishee:
Smithfield Foods Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Steepleton v. Wilson et al
as 5:2020ct03037
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fritz Steepleton, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Gardner, Sgt. Wilson and Polk Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colbert v. Polk Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2018ct03204
Defendant:
Wendy Hardy, Charles T. Johnson, Elderidge Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Lamontae Nathaniel Colbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Polk Correctional Institution
as 5:2018ct03128
Plaintiff:
Terrence Robinson
Defendant:
Polk Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stroud v. Polk Correctional Institution
as 5:2015ct03252
Plaintiff:
Maurice Stroud
Defendant:
Polk Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2012mc00064
Petitioner:
Sentellus McDonald
Respondent:
State of North Carolina, Randle Jones and Polk Correctional Institution
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shabazz v. Reid et al
as 5:2010ct03114
Plaintiff:
Hasan Jahlil Shabazz
Defendant:
Morris Reid, Mr. Sattlewhite and Administrator of Polk Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk v. Beeler et al
as 5:2009hc02126
Petitioner:
Kevin Sean Polk
Respondent:
A. F. Beeler and David T. Huband
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
