Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02033
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024ct03032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02027
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02013
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
as 5:2023hc02255
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hall v. DAC Prison et al
as 5:2023ct03251
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall and Abdul Al Kareem Muhammad
Defendant:
DAC Prison and Raymond Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
El-Alamin v. Kelly et al
as 5:2023hc02081
Petitioner:
Malik Al Mustafa El-Alamin
Respondent:
Warden L.B. Kelly and Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morrison v. Evans et al
as 5:2022ct03407
Plaintiff:
Randolph Morrison
Defendant:
Dr. Charlotte Ann Evans, Nurse Rhonna Medlin, Kendell Mullens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
