Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lee v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 4:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Sheila Lee
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, M O'hara, Officer Rodiguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Sheila Lee
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, M O'hara, Officer Rodiguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dingle v. Khan et al
as 5:2019cv00129
Defendant:
Patricia Ellen Watson Dingle, Allen Kerr, Joseph N. Calloway and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dingle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Banks v. Trump et al
as 5:2017ct03060
Defendant:
Trump, Mitch McConnell, Governor of Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
Banks and Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Britt et al
as 5:2014ct03270
Plaintiff:
Charlette Dufray Johnson
Defendant:
W. Earl Britt, Jason Crowley, Gaston Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bussie et al v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 5:2013cv00578
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bussie and Taron Bussie
Defendant:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, National Credit Union Administration Board, Federal Trade Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
SED, Inc. of South Carolina v. Seahawk Marketing & Management, LLC et al
as 7:2010cv00195
Plaintiff:
SED, Inc. of South Carolina
Defendant:
Joey Harrington , Seahawk Marketing & Management, LLC , Lucky Flops, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Pittman et al v. Exam et al
as 4:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Mitch Pittman and Corey Jermaine Bullock
Defendant:
Alan Exam and Town of Enfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
