Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Wright v. Greene et al
as 5:2024ct03060
Plaintiff:
Kayie Shaune Wright
Defendant:
E. Greene, S. Fraser, Sergeant Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 222 Telecommunications Act of 1996
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jett v. Powell
as 7:2023cv01674
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Jett, Jr., Tara S. Jett, I.R.J. and others
Defendant:
The Country Acres Association of Columbus County Ltd., George Parker Coleman, Michael P. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jett et al v. Woodard et al
as 7:2023cv01616
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Jett, Jr., Tara S. Jett, I.R.J. and others
Defendant:
A J Woodard, Amanda Parker and Taylor Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Parker v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2023ct03181
Plaintiff:
Tre M. Parker
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety and Marilyn Gamewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
