Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Andrews v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021ct03072
Defendant: AUSA Kimberly A. Moore, AUSA Rudy E. Renfer, AUSA Kelly M. Perry and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dayman et al v. Floating Shanti, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00355
Plaintiff: Mrs rudi mack, Mrs Amanda Dayman and Mrs Norelle Iyer
Defendant: Floating Shanti, LLC and Mrs Nicole Sawyer Walcott
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Carmon v. Hooks
as 5:2019hc02178
Respondent: Erik Hooks
Petitioner: Rudy Gay Carmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bussie v. Cohen et al
as 5:2018hc02294
Respondent: Joseph DeGenova, United States Attorney, Mark Martins and others
Petitioner: Anthony Bussie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sinclair v. State of North Carolina et al
as 7:2012cv00007
Plaintiff: John Sinclair
Defendant: State of North Carolina, City of Lumberton, Robeson County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Wilder v. USA
as 5:2011cv00771
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Lorenzo Rudy Wilder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Dunlap et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00077
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant: Barney Dunlap, Sierra Fox and Rudy Fox
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00107
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melvin v. Astrue et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00347
Plaintiff: Pamela Melvin
Defendant: Michael Astrue, Louise Flanagan, Edison Sessoms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Johnson v. Cruden et al
as 5:2008ct03082
Plaintiff: James Artis Johnson
Defendant: Jeffery J. Cruden and Rudy E. Renfer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?