Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Steed v. Hobgood et al
as 5:2024ct03148
Defendant:
Sgt. Hobgood, Sgt. Kinard and Ashton R. Reams
Plaintiff:
Byron Steed and Byron Lynn Steed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2023ct03207
Plaintiff:
Travis L. Walters
Defendant:
Shanticia Hawkins, Unit Manager Reams, John Doe Lieutenant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022ct03116
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Shanticia Hawkins, Byron T. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pridgen v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2021ct03343
Plaintiff:
Richard Pridgen
Defendant:
Shanticia Hawkins, Shirley Bennett, Kimberly Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Adcock et al
as 5:2019ct03329
Defendant:
Karen M. Johnson, Assistant Warden Bennett, C/O Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reams v. USA
as 5:2012cv00479
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Cecil Terrance Reams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Chapman Personal Property
as 4:2009cv00164
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Chapman Personal Property, One HP Photosmart Printer, Model C4240, SN: CN7B3RG2ZN, One Ream of Opened Printer Paper and others
Cause Of Action: Counterfeit Forfeiture
Broadcast Music, Incorporated et al v. NEXT DOOR, INC., INC. d/b/a NEXT DOOR et al
as 4:2007cv00124
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Incorporated, EMI VIRGIN SONGS, INC. d/b/a EMI LONGITUDE MUSIC, Songs Of Universal, Inc. and others
Defendant:
NEXT DOOR, INC., INC. d/b/a NEXT DOOR, ROGER MICHAEL EUBANKS and KRISTINA EUBANKS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
