Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gervat v. Bailo et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Linden v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KAMA LINDEN
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Holder et al v. Bailo
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Braxton Holder and Edward L. Weaver
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Watson v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Brian M Watson
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Thomas R. Greco and Jeffrey W. Shepherd
Suarez v. Advanced Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Miguel Suarez
Defendant:
Advanced Auto Parts, Inc., Thomas R. Greco and Jeffrey W. Shepherd
Shepherd v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Charles Shepherd
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Fogg v. U.S.A. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) et al
as 5:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Fogg
Defendant:
U.S.A. Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Division of Department of Homeland Security, Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Harris v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Katherine Harris
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shepherd et al v. LPL Financial LLC
as 5:2017cv00150
Defendant:
LPL Financial LLC
Plaintiff:
Holton B. Shepherd , Bonnie L. Shepherd , Robert C. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shepherd v. Clay
as 5:2016hc02221
Petitioner:
Maurice Shepherd
Respondent:
Harvey Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
