Cases 1 - 10 of 282
Costa v. White DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE 5:24-CV-268-M-RN.
as 4:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Valeria Cesanelli
Petitioner:
Romeo Mathew Costa
Defendant:
James Joseph White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Costa v. White
as 5:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Romeo Mathew Costa
Defendant:
James Joseph White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
White v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2024hc02087
Petitioner:
Patrick White
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Robert D. White
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
White v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Jim White
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE DOCKETED IN 5:24-HC-2042-BO. White
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
Melvin Lee White, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White
as 5:2024hc02042
Petitioner:
Melvin Lee White, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester v. Yawn et al
as 5:2023ct03348
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
Colleen Yawn, Tana Dillard-Hill, William M. Mouring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Bellinger et al
as 5:2023ct03313
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
D. Bellinger and J. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01497
Plaintiff:
Robert White and Robert J. White
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
